Reero
Account Details
SteamID64 76561198071785065
SteamID3 [U:1:111519337]
SteamID32 STEAM_0:1:55759668
Country Italy
Signed Up November 15, 2015
Last Posted April 2, 2024 at 9:54 PM
Posts 2103 (0.7 per day)
Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity 6.91
Windows Sensitivity 6/11
Raw Input 1
DPI
400
Resolution
1920x1080
Refresh Rate
240hz
Hardware Peripherals
Mouse Logitech G Pro
Keyboard Logitech G Pro Keyboard
Mousepad Steelseries QCK +
Headphones Apple earbuds
Monitor Alienware 240hz
1 ⋅⋅ 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ⋅⋅ 137
#1445 stream highlights in Videos

https://clips.twitch.tv/b3arodactyl/LivelyAlpacaPraiseIt
https://clips.twitch.tv/b3arodactyl/WittyPonyPanicBasket
https://clips.twitch.tv/b3arodactyl/CarefulCoyoteKreygasm

posted about 7 years ago
#5 sauna slayers -sil +thiagrr in TF2 General Discussion

was he cut? cus if so wtf sil pounded @i58

posted about 7 years ago
#59 Pokemon Sun and Moon in Other Games
m4risawheres my stealth rock nerf

tbh im fine with thunder wave/eviolite/unaware nerf

i hate chansey

posted about 7 years ago
#782 2016 election live results in World Events
whymeoReeroIt can also be argued that if every state all over the country had uniform, lax, gun laws, than the overall murder rate could fall. Again, this is using Texas and other states with lax gun laws as a model. If everyone owns guns and is encouraged to purchase them, then less people will try to rob/attack others in fear that they too own a gun.
I don't think it's common sense that everyone having guns would result in less gun violence. I could only see that resulting in more violence, not less. Either way, the U.S. already HAS the highest amount of guns per capita and yet has quite high homicide rates, especially for a high-income country. So this argument just doesn't make any sense.

I mean once again, look at Texas. Very lax gun laws, tons of gun ownership. They have a very low crime rate.

Also, the overall homicide rate in the US is on a downward trend.

eeetrying to use Chicago to explain why gun laws don't work is like trying to use the most recent Measles outbreaks to prove herd immunity is bullshit

Chicago doesn't exist in a vacuum, all the surrounding areas have lax gun laws that make acquiring one a day trip at worst. The problem with trying to use comparative stats to discuss gun laws is that both sides can point to other areas to show where gun laws are good or bad. Japan has strict gun control and a far greater suicide rate than the US while Australia has strict control and lower homicide rates that can be measured as decreasing since gun bans took effect.

So many cultural and socioeconomic factors play into things like crime and gun violence as well as suicide and mental health that it becomes nearly impossible to even try to test gun laws in a scientific way. This makes most of the stats basically useless for comparison.

Good point, but still, perhaps total gun prohibition is not the solution? I can see how an increase to our education system can do a lot more for the crime/poverty in Chicago than an all-out gun ban could. If we improve our pre-schooling systems than more educated will come out of Chicago rather than criminals. http://www.eoionline.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/early-learning/ELCLinkCrimeReduction-Jul02.pdf

posted about 7 years ago
#13 TF2 update for 11/10/16 (11/11/16 UTC) in TF2 General Discussion
gemmArtz_HispanianWhat does color correction actually do ??
alters colour balance slightly. not sure how it was broken.

also wtf what's wrong with letting teammates know where a sniper/spy is when you die

I'm almost 100% sure the old color correction literally did nothing lmao.

correct me if I'm wrong.

posted about 7 years ago
#779 2016 election live results in World Events
whymeoReerowhymeoReeroIt was in response to mustard who said that he wanted an assault weapons ban..
Right, but linking those stats and saying "an assault weapons ban is pointless because most homicides in the U.S. are committed with handguns" doesn't seem like a good argument to me. When most homicides are committed with some form of gun, I believe the solution is to ban all firearms. And how the U.S. homicide rate compares to other high-income countries would indeed suggest that the U.S. needs to ban firearms if they want the homicide rate to decrease.

The NRA has too much power for that to happen anytime soon anyway, so it's just theoretical.

I don't agree with this solution, as places like Chicago make it very difficult to acquire guns, yet the murder rate is very high. Compare that to a place like Texas, where the gun laws are very lax, yet the murder rate is very low. Prohibition is often never the solution to a problem, as evinced by the past attempt to prohibit alcohol, and our current failing attempts to prohibit drugs.

I cannot think of any other issue why the homicide-rate in the U.S. would be higher than all other high-income nations except our ability to purchase guns freely. Perhaps I'm wrong but that seems to be the difference. Bans in certain places in the country don't necessarily suggest that bans on guns don't help homicide rates if people can just get their guns from other places in the country.

If, however, the homicide rate stays the same in all places in the U.S. that have enacted stricter gun laws but the number of gun related homicides decreases while other methods for committing homicide increase, perhaps you could argue that guns are not the cause for higher homicide rates in the U.S.

It can also be argued that if every state all over the country had uniform, lax, gun laws, than the overall murder rate could fall. Again, this is using Texas and other states with lax gun laws as a model. If everyone owns guns and is encouraged to purchase them, then less people will try to rob/attack others in fear that they too own a gun.

The only exception to my last argument is the gang on gang violence in Chicago, but that is mostly criminals using illegal/black market guns to murder other criminals who sport illegally acquired guns, so all out prohibition won't help anyone.

posted about 7 years ago
#51 Pokemon Sun and Moon in Other Games

anyone interested in competitive this YouTube channel has posted info on tons of new leaks and how they affect the competitive meta.

posted about 7 years ago
#777 2016 election live results in World Events
whymeoReeroIt was in response to mustard who said that he wanted an assault weapons ban..
Right, but linking those stats and saying "an assault weapons ban is pointless because most homicides in the U.S. are committed with handguns" doesn't seem like a good argument to me. When most homicides are committed with some form of gun, I believe the solution is to ban all firearms. And how the U.S. homicide rate compares to other high-income countries would indeed suggest that the U.S. needs to ban firearms if they want the homicide rate to decrease.

The NRA has too much power for that to happen anytime soon anyway, so it's just theoretical.

I don't agree with this solution, as places like Chicago make it very difficult to acquire guns, yet the murder rate is very high. Compare that to a place like Texas, where the gun laws are very lax, yet the murder rate is very low. Prohibition is often never the solution to a problem, as evinced by the historic attempt to prohibit alcohol, and our current failing attempts to prohibit drugs.

posted about 7 years ago
#775 2016 election live results in World Events
whymeoI feel, based on her earlier posts in this thread, she thinks you shouldn't ban any guns at all, not just that you banning assault weapons is pointless. Which is not, in my opinion, the logical conclusion to draw from the very stats she posted.

It was in response to mustard who said that he wanted an assault weapons ban..

posted about 7 years ago
#771 2016 election live results in World Events
whymeom4risaThe FBI's Supplemental Homicide
Reports show that 57% of all murders
in 1993 were committed with handguns,
3% with rifles, 5% with shotguns,
and 5% with firearms where the type
was unknown.

1993 I know, but the case still stands. The only issue I can see with "assault weapons" is the maximized amount of damage they can do, in which case a ban on larger magazines would suffice enough.

"Assault weapon" just goes to show how much mainstream media you eat up, fearmongering term.

57% of homicides were committed with handguns so we shouldn't ban any guns...

Unless your position is we should ban handguns but not assault weapons which would be even more stupid.

Her point is that banning assault weapons accomplishes nothing. How does banning assault weapons make the 57% of handgun homicides go down? There will never be an all-out ban on handguns, too many people from both sides oppose that, but banning assault rifles really doesn't accomplish much..

posted about 7 years ago
#763 2016 election live results in World Events
mustardoverlordrocketslayWhy do people need assault rifles? If you're defending your home, a pistol will suffice, right? We haven't reached the point where there's open warfare in the streets or anything
a lot of people legitimately believe that the main reason they need guns is to protect themselves from the government

which an assault rifle wouldn't exactly help much with if the armed forces were after you but shrug

If more people have assault weapons in the hypothetical case that the US becomes tyrannical, conflict between citizens and the military will be forced. Forced conflict, rather than citizens not revolting and having their rights surrendered makes these military units more likely to mutiny*, and encourages citizens to fight against the government because they know people have access to these assault weapons. The main point is that having assault weapons encourages forced conflict in the face of tyranny, which makes fighting a war on citizens harder.

*Mutiny because US soldiers would probably not be okay with shooting their neighbor.

~~~~

also as a point to rocketslay, a lot of Americans feel they shouldn't need to justify their right to own guns, no matter how advanced they become.

posted about 7 years ago
#760 2016 election live results in World Events
mustardoverlordAs for suppressors, I don't give a fuck about them. I do believe lifting the ban on high ammunition magazines is bad, and that a blanket assault weapon ban is necessary. Well, I'd personally go a lot further than that with gun control, but some of my other opinions are more contentious; I think the assault weapons ban is the bare minimum in that regard, and a fair compromise.

This is where I disagree with you. I don't think that assault weapons are deserving of an all out ban. I have this opinion because they really never accounted for a high amount of murders in this country, or even a high amount of gun murders . Perhaps a better compromise would be a special permit for assault weapons that is difficult to get, only allowing it to be home/taken to ranges, but not impossible to acquire

A big problem I see in my home-city of New York is that they make it near impossible for you to acquire a concealed carry permit for pistols, having to state a reason for owning the gun, and having to go through grueling red tape and months of waiting before you get your permit. I would like to see this end, and while Trump hasn't said anything specific on this issue, I don't see him not addressing it in the future.

Another thing I would support is if Trump made all states recognize a ccw permit from any state. Again, not sure if Trump has said anything of this but it wouldn't surprise me if he would.

SpaceCadet
Right, but when that does happen you can sit at home under your bed with your dick shriveled up right next to mustardoverlord while you suck on each others thumbs in a fetal position.

Don't tell me how to defend myself, my family or my property.

Why do you have to insult him here? I agree with you on policy but you don't have to be an asshole about getting your point accross..

posted about 7 years ago
#753 2016 election live results in World Events
mustardoverlord

2. It was in the 100 day plan

Trump* SEVENTH, cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate change programs and use the money to fix America's water and environmental infrastructure

~~~~~~~~
3. https://www.donaldjtrump.com/policies/constitution-and-second-amendment/

TrumpBackground checks - we need to fix the system we have and make it work as intended.

I assume this means improve the background check system?

Also how exactly is lifting bans on suppressors/high ammunition magazines bad?
~~~~~~~~~~~
4. Can you go into detail on what you mean? Im confused on what you mean and even on what Trump means by using the words "criminal illegals".

posted about 7 years ago
#749 2016 election live results in World Events
SpaceGhostsCoffeeNot really related to the current discussion, but here's a list of things Trump has done since being elected (that I am aware of):

1: Nominated climate change denier Myron Ebell as the leader of his EPA transition team, pissing off pretty much everyone who isn't a climate change denier or in the coal/gas business

2: Says he wants to impose congressional term limits (which was in his 100 day plan), pissing off McConnell and pretty much everyone in congress

3: Claimed in an interview today that he likes main Obamacare provisions 'very much', pissing off the anti-obamacare republicans

4: Replaced Christie with Pence as the leader of his transition effort, which isn't really surprising at all

He has also released his plans to withdraw from the TPP, fund clean water and infrastructure improvement, and lift bans on increased gun magazine sizes and suppressors while trying to improve the current background-check and mental health systems.

What interested me most about his plans to deport illegals is that in his 100 day plan he called for the deportation of "criminal illegals", which means he might only deport illegal immigrants that have committed crimes.

I like most of these plans, especially the lift on suppressor bans, as anyone with any knowledge on guns knows that suppressors only serve to protect the ears of people shooting the guns and don't really make the gun "silent".

posted about 7 years ago
#15 lfp IM in Recruitment (looking for players)

minecraft will farm IM s24

posted about 7 years ago
1 ⋅⋅ 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ⋅⋅ 137