https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XKJneHNB3E&t=50

subjective likes and dislikes do not account into criticism. real criticism is funded in the objective analysis into a work's fundamental characteristics in a given medium, which literally nobody does. someone can like something bad just as much someone can dislike something good. the likes and dislikes do not define an anime in its essence, just its general popularity and how its viewed by the media.

also, with just the little information you released, i can pretty much think about plenty of reasons why you wouldn't like it that doesn't include the anime itself being bad...not that i feel like i should expand on this.

am i the only one who thinks he should have changed the name? just to give that flavor of "new" or smth

@inhake
Try Ergo Proxy,animatrix, steins;gate and gantz.

it DID came out pretty amazing! nice work dude, will def be using it.

amen. the use of classical literature in psycho-pass and the "villain's" general intelligence and wisdom mixed with his crazyness in a futuristic, false utopia setting in psycho-pass gives me such a weeabo boner.

and darker than black is basically electric batman. how can that NOT be awesome.

although it generally works that way, mainstream doesn't necessarily mean "bad quality". Shingeki no Kyojin's excellence is overshadowed by its popularity which obviously generates controversy and unnecessary drama/equivocated criticism.

trust me, if nobody knew about attack on titan, then no one would have anything bad to say about it. watch it please. It's not perfect because there's no perfect anime, but it sure is a great anime.

oh yes. brilliant anime. forgot that one. definitely for mature people, those shounen fuckboys won't get this anime at all.

also forgot about darker than black, durarara, death note and fate/zero, gosh my memory sucks...

nice ad hominem.

anyway, It isn't my fault if lumieres worded his statement wrong. but sure i can concur that in the medium of entertainment, you get to choose what fits you better. But claiming that playing tf2 can give you lessons that you can't learn in school, or other entertainment options, such as sports, or even social relations is like the biggest bullshit you can make up to try to reason why you play games in your computer. it makes zero sense.

err, no you cant? do you really think that whatever "lesson" or "experience" you might gain from playing tf2 competitive is worth more than real-life lessons you can get from, you know, being outside?

i play tf2 competitive because i've been playing games on my computer since i was a kid so i got used to this type of "fun". and i'm a lazy ass person. i don't pretend to make up bullshit excuses as to why i do it like "i'll get good life lessons from playing a game in my computer".

also

That's not how it works. there are things you can do opposed to playing tf2 a bunch that are not time-wasting, they're actually very helpful to your future, some of them being what will mold you in those next generations. you play tf2 a bunch as opposed to them because you don't feel obligated or whatever.

*sigh......

fma brotherhood
psycho-pass
steins;gate
snk
zankyou no terror
samurai champloo
cowboy bebop
monster

damn, trackmania nations forever...used to play that game all the time.

Is it even possible to know what the first account on steam was?

sigh...no rhythm, very mediocre sounds tbh. i don't like these heavy songs in the first place but there are some which i can agree to have some production quality. that one is not one of those.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHuauFINmIk

can we also do "Longest Hour count on a game" too?

yeah if this is anything but placebo i'd be surprised.

gotta tell you though, this game is probably like the most placebo-dependent game there is. just a mild switch of config or hud can get you from those shitty plays to hitting airshots every second or so until this "effect" lays off. then you're back to being shitty again.