* - Considering this is a leak, nothing is confirmed. However, it was apparently accidentally leaked from the Game Informer July issue, which wasn't supposed to be out yet, so it's probably correct.
Show Content
- Xbox One, PC
- Campaign Multiplayer, "traditional" multiplayer mode, and a "One-Player Mode".
- Spring 2014 Release Date
- First person shooter
- "Mech" and ground combat
- "Mech's" are called Titans.
- They want these Titans to feel fast. They can dodge etc.
- If you don't want to pilot the Titan you can have it follow you, killing people as it goes along.
- Player characters are called Pilots (male and female)
- They are extremely agile. Can run on walls, multiple jumps.
- They can take down Titans. Jumping on them and shooting the "brain".
- You need to be cunning as a pilot. "Hit and fade" tactics is the term the game director uses.
- Pilots come equipped with a variety of weapons. Pistol, Assault Rifle, Anti-Titan Rocket Launcher, data knife used to hack AI characters into joining you.
- There are AI enemies on the maps.
- You survive longer than in COD. Making it more welcoming to newcomers.
- Source Engine. Building new engine = too much time.
- Source gives them 60 fps (Xbox detail)
- Modified Source - "Rewriting major portions of it".
- Going for a District 9 or Blade Runner vibe.
- Integrate memorable single player moments into a multiplayer game.
- Storytelling style will be more Left 4 Dead.
- Humans segregated between Earth and frontier planets. Corporation trying to take the resources of these frontier people.
- Progression system. No details yet
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, yeah, there you have it I guess. I'm not sure who else has been keeping up with Respawn, if anyone, but I'm pretty stoked about this as it looks/sounds quite interesting.
If there's anyone interested, the game will be revealed on Day 2 of E3 (June 12th), I believe via Twitch.
[b]* - Considering this is a leak, nothing is confirmed. However, it was apparently accidentally leaked from the Game Informer July issue, which wasn't supposed to be out yet, so it's probably correct.[/b]
[spoiler][img]http://i.imgur.com/bXp238Z.jpg[/img][/spoiler]
[b]-[/b] Xbox One, PC
[b]-[/b] Campaign Multiplayer, "traditional" multiplayer mode, and a "One-Player Mode".
[b]-[/b] Spring 2014 Release Date
[b]-[/b] First person shooter
[b]-[/b] "Mech" and ground combat
[b]-[/b] "Mech's" are called Titans.
[b]-[/b] They want these Titans to feel fast. They can dodge etc.
[b]-[/b] If you don't want to pilot the Titan you can have it follow you, killing people as it goes along.
[b]-[/b] Player characters are called Pilots (male and female)
[b]-[/b] They are extremely agile. Can run on walls, multiple jumps.
[b]-[/b] They can take down Titans. Jumping on them and shooting the "brain".
[b]-[/b] You need to be cunning as a pilot. "Hit and fade" tactics is the term the game director uses.
[b]-[/b] Pilots come equipped with a variety of weapons. Pistol, Assault Rifle, Anti-Titan Rocket Launcher, data knife used to hack AI characters into joining you.
[b]-[/b] There are AI enemies on the maps.
[b]-[/b] You survive longer than in COD. Making it more welcoming to newcomers.
[b]- Source Engine. Building new engine = too much time.
- Source gives them 60 fps[/b] (Xbox detail)
[b]- Modified Source - "Rewriting major portions of it".[/b]
[b]-[/b] Going for a District 9 or Blade Runner vibe.
[b]-[/b] Integrate memorable single player moments into a multiplayer game.
[b]-[/b] Storytelling style will be more Left 4 Dead.
[b]-[/b] Humans segregated between Earth and frontier planets. Corporation trying to take the resources of these frontier people.
[b]-[/b] Progression system. No details yet
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, yeah, there you have it I guess. I'm not sure who else has been keeping up with Respawn, if anyone, but I'm pretty stoked about this as it looks/sounds quite interesting.
If there's anyone interested, the game will be revealed on Day 2 of E3 (June 12th), I believe via Twitch.
Hope it doesn't turn out like Brink
Hope it doesn't turn out like Brink
Iunno, the people who make call of duty aren't exactly my favorite developers.
Iunno, the people who make call of duty aren't exactly my favorite developers.
CondescendingCandlestickIunno, the people who make call of duty aren't exactly my favorite developers.
To be fair, CoD 2 and CoD 4 were extremely good games in the series, objectively the best two. Blame it on the activision milk machine - hopefully Respawn wont make 600 games a franchise.
[quote=CondescendingCandlestick]Iunno, the people who make call of duty aren't exactly my favorite developers.[/quote]
To be fair, CoD 2 and CoD 4 were extremely good games in the series, objectively the best two. Blame it on the activision milk machine - hopefully Respawn wont make 600 games a franchise.
yukiCondescendingCandlestickIunno, the people who make call of duty aren't exactly my favorite developers.
To be fair, CoD 2 and CoD 4 were extremely good games in the series, objectively the best two. Blame it on the activision milk machine - hopefully Respawn wont make 600 games a franchise.
I liked the first call of duty, but everything else was bad imo. Maybe that's just me.
[quote=yuki][quote=CondescendingCandlestick]Iunno, the people who make call of duty aren't exactly my favorite developers.[/quote]
To be fair, CoD 2 and CoD 4 were extremely good games in the series, objectively the best two. Blame it on the activision milk machine - hopefully Respawn wont make 600 games a franchise.[/quote]
I liked the first call of duty, but everything else was bad imo. Maybe that's just me.
Cod 2 Rifles only. snd / ctf best game ever. and cod 4 when it first came out.
Cod 2 Rifles only. snd / ctf best game ever. and cod 4 when it first came out.
Weren't the Serious Sam games' engine based around the source engine?
Weren't the Serious Sam games' engine based around the source engine?
yukiCondescendingCandlestickIunno, the people who make call of duty aren't exactly my favorite developers.
To be fair, CoD 2 and CoD 4 were extremely good games in the series, objectively the best two. Blame it on the activision milk machine - hopefully Respawn wont make 600 games a franchise.
gonna go out on a limb here and say BO2 is the best game released since cod4. if you ignore the so-so matchmaking, it's usually pretty fun
as for this game though, i can't say much but i hope its good
[quote=yuki][quote=CondescendingCandlestick]Iunno, the people who make call of duty aren't exactly my favorite developers.[/quote]
To be fair, CoD 2 and CoD 4 were extremely good games in the series, objectively the best two. Blame it on the activision milk machine - hopefully Respawn wont make 600 games a franchise.[/quote]
gonna go out on a limb here and say BO2 is the best game released since cod4. if you ignore the so-so matchmaking, it's usually pretty fun
as for this game though, i can't say much but i hope its good
They could really capitalize on hawkens flop(?), I was so excited for that game but they havent done shit with it in forever.
Hoping for a mech twitch shooter
They could really capitalize on hawkens flop(?), I was so excited for that game but they havent done shit with it in forever.
Hoping for a mech twitch shooter
32hzThey could really capitalize on hawkens flop(?)
Removing the question mark is fine. I remember playing the Alpha and then reading the forums. Some incredibly vocal cunt actually thought that being able to change your graphics settings was cheating and that people who didn't have "his setup" just shouldn't play the game.
[quote=32hz]They could really capitalize on hawkens flop(?)[/quote]
Removing the question mark is fine. I remember playing the Alpha and then reading the forums. Some incredibly vocal cunt actually thought that being able to change your graphics settings was cheating and that people who didn't have "his setup" just shouldn't play the game.
Hawken was too slow. I thought it was cool that they were going for a mix between western "tank-like" mechs and gundams, but fuck that. The nerds were upset that the mechs didnt feel enough like mechs, and the fps players realized that all they wanted to fly jehuty and anubis.
Hawken was too slow. I thought it was cool that they were going for a mix between western "tank-like" mechs and gundams, but fuck that. The nerds were upset that the mechs didnt feel enough like mechs, and the fps players realized that all they wanted to fly jehuty and anubis.
gr8stalin32hzThey could really capitalize on hawkens flop(?)
Removing the question mark is fine. I remember playing the Alpha and then reading the forums. Some incredibly vocal cunt actually thought that being able to change your graphics settings was cheating and that people who didn't have "his setup" just shouldn't play the game.
can you humor me and post the link
[quote=gr8stalin][quote=32hz]They could really capitalize on hawkens flop(?)[/quote]
Removing the question mark is fine. I remember playing the Alpha and then reading the forums. Some incredibly vocal cunt actually thought that being able to change your graphics settings was cheating and that people who didn't have "his setup" just shouldn't play the game.[/quote]
can you humor me and post the link
I am beyond excited for this game, though worried because it's EA publishing :/.
Still, CoD 2 and CoD 4 were excellent.
Give me another CoD4 quality shooter and I'm in.
I am beyond excited for this game, though worried because it's EA publishing :/.
Still, CoD 2 and CoD 4 were excellent.
Give me another CoD4 quality shooter and I'm in.
maybe it's gonna be a good game and all but does this really belong on a website calle TEAMFORTRESS.tv?
maybe it's gonna be a good game and all but does this really belong on a website calle TEAMFORTRESS.tv?
TheJatshmaybe it's gonna be a good game and all but does this really belong on a website calle TEAMFORTRESS.tv?
it's in off-topic derp
[quote=TheJatsh]maybe it's gonna be a good game and all but does this really belong on a website calle TEAMFORTRESS.tv?[/quote]
it's in off-topic derp
It's off-topic. People can talk about what they want if it's in the right section
It's off-topic. People can talk about what they want if it's in the right section
prepare to be dissapointed
prepare to be dissapointed
This will not be on Steam ;-; No matter how much I dislike steam (lately mostly), origin is far worse from the two games I have played ;-;
This will not be on Steam ;-; No matter how much I dislike steam (lately mostly), origin is far worse from the two games I have played ;-;
TheJatshmaybe it's gonna be a good game and all but does this really belong on a website calle TEAMFORTRESS.tv?
Let me ask you a question. This is teamfortress.tv as you said, correct. There's a general discussion and an off topic section. If the general discussion section is meant for discussing TF2 in its entirety, then what would off topic be for?
pls respond
[quote=TheJatsh]maybe it's gonna be a good game and all but does this really belong on a website calle TEAMFORTRESS.tv?[/quote]
Let me ask you a question. This is [b]teamfortress[/b].tv as you said, correct. There's a [i]general discussion[/i] and an [i]off topic[/i] section. If the general discussion section is meant for discussing TF2 in its entirety, then what would off topic be for?
pls respond
kirbycan you humor me and post the link
http://puu.sh/1brlD
http://puu.sh/1brkx
This guy's justification for his belief is that it keeps the playing field "even". As bad as this place can get, I look at these images to remind myself that yes, it CAN get worse.
[quote=kirby]can you humor me and post the link[/quote]
http://puu.sh/1brlD
http://puu.sh/1brkx
This guy's justification for his belief is that it keeps the playing field "even". As bad as this place can get, I look at these images to remind myself that yes, it CAN get worse.
kirbyTheJatshmaybe it's gonna be a good game and all but does this really belong on a website calle TEAMFORTRESS.tv?
Let me ask you a question. This is teamfortress.tv as you said, correct. There's a general discussion and an off topic section. If the general discussion section is meant for discussing TF2 in its entirety, then what would off topic be for?
pls respond
sorry didn't know there was an off topic sectionI#m pretty new here. However i still think it's weird to post it on this webside :/
[quote=kirby][quote=TheJatsh]maybe it's gonna be a good game and all but does this really belong on a website calle TEAMFORTRESS.tv?[/quote]
Let me ask you a question. This is [b]teamfortress[/b].tv as you said, correct. There's a [i]general discussion[/i] and an [i]off topic[/i] section. If the general discussion section is meant for discussing TF2 in its entirety, then what would off topic be for?
pls respond[/quote]
sorry didn't know there was an off topic sectionI#m pretty new here. However i still think it's weird to post it on this webside :/
TheJatshkirbyTheJatshmaybe it's gonna be a good game and all but does this really belong on a website calle TEAMFORTRESS.tv?
Let me ask you a question. This is teamfortress.tv as you said, correct. There's a general discussion and an off topic section. If the general discussion section is meant for discussing TF2 in its entirety, then what would off topic be for?
pls respond
sorry didn't know there was an off topic sectionI#m pretty new here. However i still think it's weird to post it on this webside :/
Have you tried flipping it over to the other side?
[quote=TheJatsh][quote=kirby][quote=TheJatsh]maybe it's gonna be a good game and all but does this really belong on a website calle TEAMFORTRESS.tv?[/quote]
Let me ask you a question. This is [b]teamfortress[/b].tv as you said, correct. There's a [i]general discussion[/i] and an [i]off topic[/i] section. If the general discussion section is meant for discussing TF2 in its entirety, then what would off topic be for?
pls respond[/quote]
sorry didn't know there was an off topic sectionI#m pretty new here. However i still think it's weird to post it on this webside :/[/quote]
Have you tried flipping it over to the other side?
MYLESThis will not be on Steam ;-; No matter how much I dislike steam (lately mostly), origin is far worse from the two games I have played ;-;
What really baffles me is the fact that this is using Source. Why would EA allow them to use the engine that their competitor made? It just doesn't sound like EA to me.
[quote=MYLES]This will not be on Steam ;-; No matter how much I dislike steam (lately mostly), origin is far worse from the two games I have played ;-;[/quote]
What really baffles me is the fact that this is using Source. Why would EA allow them to use the engine that their competitor made? It just doesn't sound like EA to me.
TheJatshkirbyTheJatshmaybe it's gonna be a good game and all but does this really belong on a website calle TEAMFORTRESS.tv?
Let me ask you a question. This is teamfortress.tv as you said, correct. There's a general discussion and an off topic section. If the general discussion section is meant for discussing TF2 in its entirety, then what would off topic be for?
pls respond
sorry didn't know there was an off topic sectionI#m pretty new here. However i still think it's weird to post it on this webside :/
so what we should post in offtopic? more tf2?
[quote=TheJatsh][quote=kirby][quote=TheJatsh]maybe it's gonna be a good game and all but does this really belong on a website calle TEAMFORTRESS.tv?[/quote]
Let me ask you a question. This is [b]teamfortress[/b].tv as you said, correct. There's a [i]general discussion[/i] and an [i]off topic[/i] section. If the general discussion section is meant for discussing TF2 in its entirety, then what would off topic be for?
pls respond[/quote]
sorry didn't know there was an off topic sectionI#m pretty new here. However i still think it's weird to post it on this webside :/[/quote]
so what we should post in offtopic? more tf2?