With Comanglia's stability cfg

2639 frames 15.886 seconds 166.12 fps ( 6.02 ms/f) 7.576 fps variability

2639 frames 16.154 seconds 163.37 fps ( 6.12 ms/f) 12.263 fps variability

2639 frames 15.901 seconds 165.96 fps ( 6.03 ms/f) 11.996 fps variability

With R4ndoms cfg

2639 frames 15.513 seconds 170.12 fps ( 5.88 ms/f) 13.274 fps variability

2639 frames 15.246 seconds 173.09 fps ( 5.78 ms/f) 10.504 fps variability

2639 frames 15.240 seconds 173.17 fps ( 5.77 ms/f) 10.731 fps variability

Nice job!

Edit: Comanglia's potato cfg with mat_viewupscale 1

2639 frames 15.602 seconds 169.14 fps ( 5.91 ms/f) 12.061 fps variability

2639 frames 17.077 seconds 154.53 fps ( 6.47 ms/f) 16.529 fps variability

2639 frames 16.217 seconds 162.73 fps ( 6.15 ms/f) 18.116 fps variability

Wasn't source engine using only 2 threads common knowledge? It seemed like it when I was building this a year ago.

Edit: What I don't understand is how some people here get 190-200+ fps in that demo. Does the bigger amount of cache really help that much?

Thought I would see how my dual core compares

2639 frames 15.886 seconds 166.12 fps ( 6.02 ms/f) 7.576 fps variability

2639 frames 16.154 seconds 163.37 fps ( 6.12 ms/f) 12.263 fps variability

2639 frames 15.901 seconds 165.96 fps ( 6.03 ms/f) 11.996 fps variability

CPU and overclock: G3258 @ 4.4 GHz
Graphics Card: R9 270x

dxlevel (default is 90): 81
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Comanglia's Max Stability
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

Additional notes: mat_picmip -1, No hats mod, google chrome running, TF2 freshly opened, Win8.1

It seems the first run after opening TF2 is always the best for me