Strawberry
Account Details
SteamID64 76561198047845181
SteamID3 [U:1:87579453]
SteamID32 STEAM_0:1:43789726
Country United States
Signed Up July 5, 2016
Last Posted March 28, 2018 at 8:43 PM
Posts 2 (0 per day)
Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity
Windows Sensitivity
Raw Input  
DPI
 
Resolution
 
Refresh Rate
 
Hardware Peripherals
Mouse  
Keyboard  
Mousepad  
Headphones  
Monitor  
#114 RGL.gg is coming to Europe with a $1,000 prizepool in TF2 General Discussion

Hi sigafoo, I wanted to give my input as a spectator. While I don't play competitive TF2, I've watched HL, RGL, and 6s, and I find both competitive TF2 and the community very interesting. I did attempt to get into competitive TF2 a long time ago, however; one of my friends introduced me to Highlander, where I decided to try out engineer and stumbled upon videos of your gameplay, which I enjoyed. Eventually, though, I realized that what I liked about TF2 compared to other games was the fast-paced, DM-heavy style, which I couldn't play as engineer, so I looked into 6s scout instead.

That brings me to my opinion on what makes TF2 fun to watch: the very same fast-paced game with mechanical skill that I liked to play. Can a roamer bomb in and get a clean shot on the medic with an airshot to finish them off? Can a scout finish off the weakened enemy team after most of their team is dead? These thoughts make the game interesting to spectate, especially with an offensive team, or when much is on the line like the Australians in the Insomnia series.

I admire the work you're putting into RGL by dropping your own money into it and casting the matches, but personally, I don't like watching it. With 14 players, it's just too difficult for one individual player to shine (or even kept track of in the first place). There's less full wipes, more pyros and engis (which I find uninteresting to watch), and (while this isn't a problem with the gamemode itself) no high stakes or rivalries.

I think the pick/ban format is a hot topic, and what I'm thinking is that it can be interesting to leave powerful weapons in specifically to see how the teams take advantage of it. I'm assuming your view is similar, because there aren't enough bans to get rid of particularly powerful unlocks (Bonk, Natascha, Wrangler, etc.), but please correct me if I'm wrong. However, when these powerful items are ones that encourage stalemates rather than aggression, taking advantage of it just makes the game unfun to watch.

All of that said, I don't think it's wrong that you've put some money into your league. It's unlikely that someone has stopped playing 6s or HL because of 7v7, unless they didn't enjoy 6s/HL in the first place, so I don't think it's fragmenting the community compared to the ESEA vs CEVO fiasco. But I think there's lots of improvement to be desired for RGL to be spectator-friendly, and I don't think it's much of a strategic gamemode.

posted about 6 years ago
#1 Soldier banners question in TF2 General Discussion

What makes the banners non-viable? The concheror is easy to fill up, and the backup gives max 220/330 HP, along with the banners in general giving an advantage while they're used. Are they just not as good as the space created from gunboats, and damage/help against scouts from a shotgun?

posted about 7 years ago