Sounds like some quality Non-STEM science right there.

responding to your meme with meme:

http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/738/025/db0.jpg

You'd probably lose a fight to an 8 year old with brittle bone disease in actuality but hypothetically, sure.
At it's root, it's an extreme example of Submissive/Dominant relationships. Given that a child is mentally frail and has very little capability of actually arguing it's merits you have the dominant hand. Similar to rape fantasies, it's a power fetish. Given that the submissive party has no way of resisting (in actuality -- get your pedant bullshit out of here, manlet) it is equivalent to rape. If your sexuality is dependent on the other party being invalid, it is wrong.
Homosexuality does not rely on this power structure to exist. It can exist in equals.
If your argument is that a 13 year old can have the same mental faculties as a 30 year old, you have a semi-valid point (as well as an irl example in yourself). There are different rates of maturity, and they can have extremes. However, because of these being minutia at best, it is blanketed as wrong.

usually the opposite is the path people take.
They're like gay -> animal fucking.

On your moral argument: It's harm onto something that is incapable of actually fighting back.

Edifice would be a solid choice to replace an otherwise pretty plain map.

Consent would be the intrinsic part of it. Just like animals can not consent, children are incapable of giving consent. There are some questionable areas when you start talking in the teens, as all people mature at different times, but in general adulthood is fairly cemented around 16 (the majority of the us has some caveats about the legality of sex with a minor around 16) and, since there isn't a way to really tell when a person is an adult, legally, we just say an average age of around 18 is acceptable for people to have legal control of themselves.
If you're seriously thinking that mental capacities aren't insanely limited for a child (lolicon and similar things depict people prepubescence or in early pubescence), maybe you shouldn't be around them for a couple more decades.

This is a blatant lie, or the most sophomoric shit I've ever heard.

Legally: 1) n. a voluntary agreement to another's proposition.
Literally: noun 1.permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.

It is saying "yes" with no caveats. While yes, with some situations this gets lost in translation between adults, it is insanely rare that a child would agree to the act on it's own volition.

I've never been more disgusted with a screenshot in my life

slight astigmatism

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Nah, that's the platform everybody is gonna have because video games are evil and gaming is dead.

this sums up the real talk about it.

Didn't Harry Reid talk about throwing his hat into the race? He's a viable cracker for the job.
He'd get the anti-Obama liberal audience that exists, as well as the de facto dems.

Rock n Roll, not even once.

To be honest I don't care in either direction about you. I see an opportunity to exacerbate something, i take it because we just haven't had a decent thread in forever. It's really easy to put people on blast and people read it, so why not contribute with some simplistic shittalk?

Jesus christ alfa, do you have brain damage?
A tiny dick?
Abusive parents?
Why do you feel the need to validate yourself playing fucking video games? Most people are like, "Hey, here's my CV, it's pretty impressive," but some how you've managed to make your ability to play a game at a reasonable level equivalent to writing your fucking magnum opus.
I'm not sure if you're trolling, or seriously should wear a helmet, but I'm biased toward the latter.

I didn't know you suffered severe head trauma.