Hi, since we are going with the map vetoing system in S28, there is room to have a different number of maps in the rotation. I believe a 9th map will be best for testing out the vetoing system as well as the new map for this season. I realize that there are some maps that people will want to be removed, but in the past, votes to remove/replace a map have not been progressive. The new map ban system will allow us to have more empirical evidence of which maps are banned out frequently across all divisions.
I've made a google form to allow people to vote on the addition of a new map (requires google sign-in):
ESEA S28 MAP VOTE
Please think long and hard about which map you'd like to see added. I won't only take the number of votes into account as it is a public poll.
In other news, we are accepting new IM rosters but the hijack rule will be in effect for this season. For new rosters, 4/6 of the same players must play the first 3/4 matches. For existing rosters, 2/6 returning players must play the first 3/4 matches. Please create a new open roster with at least 6 players if you'd like to be moved up to IM.
Hi, since we are going with the map vetoing system in S28, there is room to have a different number of maps in the rotation. I believe a 9th map will be best for testing out the vetoing system as well as the new map for this season. I realize that there are some maps that people will want to be removed, but in the past, votes to remove/replace a map have not been progressive. The new map ban system will allow us to have more empirical evidence of which maps are banned out frequently across all divisions.
I've made a google form to allow people to vote on the addition of a new map (requires google sign-in):
[url=https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeaIA7nXetDt7GJPG38xHCnFoP9PTndlOsQrLedRmwyvWbkLA/viewform?usp=sf_link]ESEA S28 MAP VOTE[/url]
Please think long and hard about which map you'd like to see added. I won't only take the number of votes into account as it is a public poll.
In other news, we are accepting new IM rosters but the hijack rule will be in effect for this season. For new rosters, 4/6 of the same players must play the first 3/4 matches. For existing rosters, 2/6 returning players must play the first 3/4 matches. Please create a new open roster with at least 6 players if you'd like to be moved up to IM.
fix the stvs so casts can actually happen
edit: also add badges so people actually know esea tf2 exists
fix the stvs so casts can actually happen
edit: also add badges so people actually know esea tf2 exists
a total of 0 matches will be played on thie new map :(
a total of 0 matches will be played on thie new map :(
No gpit makes me sad, even if its just for the memes.
No gpit makes me sad, even if its just for the memes.
tri saving us again. We should have more IM teams than last season then.
tri saving us again. We should have more IM teams than last season then.
Cardinal has the best chance at being successful seeing as Phi is the support behind it, I think it shows great potential.
Cardinal has the best chance at being successful seeing as Phi is the support behind it, I think it shows great potential.
Glad we're finally getting a new map in the mix and establishing a procedure for improving the map list each season. Given that so many of the maps that once entered ESEA as beta versions ended up being revised until eventually becoming official maps, this is actually a pretty big deal.
All the potential maps are pretty good and I think the map creators would all be overjoyed to see them included and all the feedback that's generated from more organized team play. Seeing as I am personally involved with cp_cardinal's development I can promise that, should the map be voted in, all gameplay and feedback from league matches will be reviewed and considered for future versions of the map.
Glad we're finally getting a new map in the mix and establishing a procedure for improving the map list each season. Given that so many of the maps that once entered ESEA as beta versions ended up being revised until eventually becoming official maps, this is actually a pretty big deal.
All the potential maps are pretty good and I think the map creators would all be overjoyed to see them included and all the feedback that's generated from more organized team play. Seeing as I am personally involved with cp_cardinal's development I can promise that, should the map be voted in, all gameplay and feedback from league matches will be reviewed and considered for future versions of the map.
b4nny I can promise that, should the map be voted in, all gameplay and feedback from league matches will be reviewed and considered for future versions of the map.
HA!
He thinks it will be played, how cute.
[quote=b4nny] I can promise that, should the map be voted in, all gameplay and feedback from league matches will be reviewed and considered for future versions of the map.[/quote]
HA!
He thinks it will be played, how cute.
Are there any gameplay vids of cp_kalinka_rc2? I've seen some streams here and there of the other maps besides that one.
Are there any gameplay vids of cp_kalinka_rc2? I've seen some streams here and there of the other maps besides that one.
either add a second koth map or just remove viaduct FOR THE LOVE OF GOD. i think via is good/fun but having 1 koth map is the dumbest thing ever.
either add a second koth map or just remove viaduct FOR THE LOVE OF GOD. i think via is good/fun but having 1 koth map is the dumbest thing ever.
Logjam has matured like fine wine, boys. Let's see it.
Logjam has matured like fine wine, boys. Let's see it.
Am I the only one who thought that reckoner wasn't that bad? That being said I do think cardinal has potential for faster paced games.
Am I the only one who thought that reckoner wasn't that bad? That being said I do think cardinal has potential for faster paced games.
Very interested to see how cardinal would be played
Very interested to see how cardinal would be played