Upvote Upvoted 39 Downvote Downvoted
1 ⋅⋅ 21 22 23 24 25
ESEA-IM S20 Happenings/Predictions
691
#691
-2 Frags +
saamsafrixCHEERISS IS THE HARD COUNTER TO TRIP AND I

[*]

nice grammar dumb ass

actually safrix's was right in this case :D :DDD

[quote=saam][quote=safrix]CHEERISS IS THE HARD COUNTER TO TRIP AND I

[*][/quote]


nice grammar dumb ass[/quote]

actually safrix's was right in this case :D :DDD
692
#692
5 Frags +

CHEERIS IS THE COUNTER TO I

how much sense does that make

CHEERIS IS THE COUNTER TO I

how much sense does that make
693
#693
8 Frags +

Hey guys, EVL is going to be covering Liko and the Manlets vs. Not Fast Food tomorrow night.

Casters are gonna be Atwas / Deer / Flatline

http://www.twitch.tv/evltv

Hey guys, EVL is going to be covering [url=https://play.esea.net/index.php?s=stats&d=match&id=5652590]Liko and the Manlets vs. Not Fast Food[/url] tomorrow night.

Casters are gonna be Atwas / Deer / Flatline

http://www.twitch.tv/evltv
694
#694
Momentum Mod
9 Frags +

team really putting on the playoff grind
http://imgur.com/a/G0qWK

team really putting on the playoff grind
http://imgur.com/a/G0qWK
695
#695
0 Frags +

saFrix have u ever taken an english class b4

saFrix have u ever taken an english class b4
696
#696
3 Frags +
mustardoverlordsaamsafrixCHEERISS IS THE HARD COUNTER TO TRIP AND I

[*]

nice grammar dumb ass

actually safrix's was right in this case :D :DDD

no you're retarded. I'm assuming you're just trolling though...which wasn't funny..

[quote=mustardoverlord][quote=saam][quote=safrix]CHEERISS IS THE HARD COUNTER TO TRIP AND I

[*][/quote]


nice grammar dumb ass[/quote]

actually safrix's was right in this case :D :DDD[/quote]

no you're retarded. I'm assuming you're just trolling though...which wasn't funny..
697
#697
-1 Frags +

safrix is black and from maryland...grammar is not high in his skill set

safrix is black and from maryland...grammar is not high in his skill set
698
#698
3 Frags +
CorsamustardoverlordsaamsafrixCHEERISS IS THE HARD COUNTER TO TRIP AND I

[*]

nice grammar dumb ass

actually safrix's was right in this case :D :DDD

no you're retarded. I'm assuming you're just trolling though...which wasn't funny..

I'm not trolling, safrix is actually correct.

You use "me" when referring to the object of the sentence and "I" when referring to the subject.

"safrix and I went to the mall" would be correct because we are the subject of the sentence.

The sentence in question is "CHEERISS is the hard counter to trip and me". In this case, CHEERISS is the subject and "trip and me" is the object. Therefore "me" is correct and "I" is not. As safrix helpfully pointed out in his follow-up post, a good way to get this right every time is to remove the first part of the subject/object, in this case "trip and", and parse the sentence without it.

In the first case, it would obviously be "I went to the mall" and not "me went to the mall". In the second, it would be "CHEERISS is the hard counter to me", not "CHEERISS is the hard counter to I". Please do not call people retarded when you do not have a working knowledge of English sentence structure, friend.

[quote=Corsa][quote=mustardoverlord][quote=saam][quote=safrix]CHEERISS IS THE HARD COUNTER TO TRIP AND I

[*][/quote]


nice grammar dumb ass[/quote]

actually safrix's was right in this case :D :DDD[/quote]

no you're retarded. I'm assuming you're just trolling though...which wasn't funny..[/quote]

I'm not trolling, safrix is actually correct.

You use "me" when referring to the object of the sentence and "I" when referring to the subject.

"safrix and I went to the mall" would be correct because we are the subject of the sentence.

The sentence in question is "CHEERISS is the hard counter to trip and me". In this case, CHEERISS is the subject and "trip and me" is the object. Therefore "me" is correct and "I" is not. As safrix helpfully pointed out in his follow-up post, a good way to get this right every time is to remove the first part of the subject/object, in this case "trip and", and parse the sentence without it.

In the first case, it would obviously be "I went to the mall" and not "me went to the mall". In the second, it would be "CHEERISS is the hard counter to me", not "CHEERISS is the hard counter to I". Please do not call people retarded when you do not have a working knowledge of English sentence structure, friend.
699
#699
2 Frags +

except safrix originally said "TRIP AND I"

except safrix originally said "TRIP AND I"
700
#700
-2 Frags +
saamexcept safrix originally said "TRIP AND I"

I refuse to believe that until you can prove it because I refuse to believe that corsa understands how grammar works

[quote=saam]except safrix originally said "TRIP AND I"[/quote]

I refuse to believe that until you can prove it because I refuse to believe that corsa understands how grammar works
701
#701
1 Frags +
mustardoverlordCorsamustardoverlordsaamsafrixCHEERISS IS THE HARD COUNTER TO TRIP AND I

[*]

nice grammar dumb ass

actually safrix's was right in this case :D :DDD

no you're retarded. I'm assuming you're just trolling though...which wasn't funny..

I'm not trolling, safrix is actually correct.

You use "me" when referring to the object of the sentence and "I" when referring to the subject.

"safrix and I went to the mall" would be correct because we are the subject of the sentence.

The sentence in question is "CHEERISS is the hard counter to trip and me". In this case, CHEERISS is the subject and "trip and me" is the object. Therefore "me" is correct and "I" is not. As safrix helpfully pointed out in his follow-up post, a good way to get this right every time is to remove the first part of the subject/object, in this case "trip and", and parse the sentence without it.

In the first case, it would obviously be "I went to the mall" and not "me went to the mall". In the second, it would be "CHEERISS is the hard counter to me", not "CHEERISS is the hard counter to I". Please do not call people retarded when you do not have a working knowledge of English sentence structure, friend.

I think safrix edited his post quickly enough that tftv didnt mark it, and saam pointed out his mistake

also saam's the one who posted the remove-part-of-sentence thingy

[quote=mustardoverlord][quote=Corsa][quote=mustardoverlord][quote=saam][quote=safrix]CHEERISS IS THE HARD COUNTER TO TRIP AND I

[*][/quote]


nice grammar dumb ass[/quote]

actually safrix's was right in this case :D :DDD[/quote]

no you're retarded. I'm assuming you're just trolling though...which wasn't funny..[/quote]

I'm not trolling, safrix is actually correct.

You use "me" when referring to the object of the sentence and "I" when referring to the subject.

"safrix and I went to the mall" would be correct because we are the subject of the sentence.

The sentence in question is "CHEERISS is the hard counter to trip and me". In this case, CHEERISS is the subject and "trip and me" is the object. Therefore "me" is correct and "I" is not. As safrix helpfully pointed out in his follow-up post, a good way to get this right every time is to remove the first part of the subject/object, in this case "trip and", and parse the sentence without it.

In the first case, it would obviously be "I went to the mall" and not "me went to the mall". In the second, it would be "CHEERISS is the hard counter to me", not "CHEERISS is the hard counter to I". Please do not call people retarded when you do not have a working knowledge of English sentence structure, friend.[/quote]
I think safrix edited his post quickly enough that tftv didnt mark it, and saam pointed out his mistake

also saam's the one who posted the remove-part-of-sentence thingy
702
#702
1 Frags +

mustard you could be making fun of me for dropping 7 rounds to cheeris and it would be way easier than this grammar shit

mustard you could be making fun of me for dropping 7 rounds to cheeris and it would be way easier than this grammar shit
703
#703
-3 Frags +
WholegrainmustardoverlordCorsamustardoverlordsaamsafrixCHEERISS IS THE HARD COUNTER TO TRIP AND I

[*]

nice grammar dumb ass

actually safrix's was right in this case :D :DDD

no you're retarded. I'm assuming you're just trolling though...which wasn't funny..

I'm not trolling, safrix is actually correct.

You use "me" when referring to the object of the sentence and "I" when referring to the subject.

"safrix and I went to the mall" would be correct because we are the subject of the sentence.

The sentence in question is "CHEERISS is the hard counter to trip and me". In this case, CHEERISS is the subject and "trip and me" is the object. Therefore "me" is correct and "I" is not. As safrix helpfully pointed out in his follow-up post, a good way to get this right every time is to remove the first part of the subject/object, in this case "trip and", and parse the sentence without it.

In the first case, it would obviously be "I went to the mall" and not "me went to the mall". In the second, it would be "CHEERISS is the hard counter to me", not "CHEERISS is the hard counter to I". Please do not call people retarded when you do not have a working knowledge of English sentence structure, friend.
I think safrix edited his post quickly enough that tftv didnt mark it, and saam pointed out his mistake

also saam's the one who posted the remove-part-of-sentence thingy

I can accept this compromise as long as we agree that corsa still doesn't understand how grammar works

[quote=Wholegrain][quote=mustardoverlord][quote=Corsa][quote=mustardoverlord][quote=saam][quote=safrix]CHEERISS IS THE HARD COUNTER TO TRIP AND I

[*][/quote]


nice grammar dumb ass[/quote]

actually safrix's was right in this case :D :DDD[/quote]

no you're retarded. I'm assuming you're just trolling though...which wasn't funny..[/quote]

I'm not trolling, safrix is actually correct.

You use "me" when referring to the object of the sentence and "I" when referring to the subject.

"safrix and I went to the mall" would be correct because we are the subject of the sentence.

The sentence in question is "CHEERISS is the hard counter to trip and me". In this case, CHEERISS is the subject and "trip and me" is the object. Therefore "me" is correct and "I" is not. As safrix helpfully pointed out in his follow-up post, a good way to get this right every time is to remove the first part of the subject/object, in this case "trip and", and parse the sentence without it.

In the first case, it would obviously be "I went to the mall" and not "me went to the mall". In the second, it would be "CHEERISS is the hard counter to me", not "CHEERISS is the hard counter to I". Please do not call people retarded when you do not have a working knowledge of English sentence structure, friend.[/quote]
I think safrix edited his post quickly enough that tftv didnt mark it, and saam pointed out his mistake

also saam's the one who posted the remove-part-of-sentence thingy[/quote]

I can accept this compromise as long as we agree that corsa still doesn't understand how grammar works
704
#704
2 Frags +

you commented on the quoted comment by saam that originally said "trip and i" which is wrong as you only recently noted. i'm not quite sure what you're getting at here...

you commented on the quoted comment by saam that originally said "trip and i" which is wrong as you only recently noted. i'm not quite sure what you're getting at here...
705
#705
Momentum Mod
-2 Frags +

look guys i know english im not retarded

look guys i know english im not retarded
706
#706
2 Frags +

fuckin dweebs

fuckin dweebs
707
#707
3 Frags +

man i am sure upset

man i am sure upset
708
#708
8 Frags +

sounds too I that your a retart corsa

sounds too I that your a retart corsa
709
#709
0 Frags +

friends pls let's not fight

friends pls let's not fight
710
#710
-4 Frags +

lol

lol
711
#711
23 Frags +

IM PREDICTION: CAN SLEMNISH CARRY MUSTARD HARD ENOUGH TO GET OUT OF IM AFTER PLAYING FOR 10 SEASONS?

no.

IM PREDICTION: CAN SLEMNISH CARRY MUSTARD HARD ENOUGH TO GET OUT OF IM AFTER PLAYING FOR 10 SEASONS?

no.
712
#712
1 Frags +

HUYPE FOR PLAYOFFS????

HUYPE!!!!

HUYPE FOR PLAYOFFS????

HUYPE!!!!
713
#713
8 Frags +

It looks like our boy ex "ex" ex is having internet issues, hopefully we can fix that before the match starts but if not we're bringing in our ALL-STAR BACKUP SECRET WEAPON

It looks like our boy ex "ex" ex is having internet issues, hopefully we can fix that before the match starts but if not we're bringing in our ALL-STAR BACKUP SECRET WEAPON
714
#714
0 Frags +

if it's crossfire i'm afraid

if it's crossfire i'm afraid
715
#715
1 Frags +
mustardoverlordIt looks like our boy ex "ex" ex is having internet issues, hopefully we can fix that before the match starts but if not we're bringing in our ALL-STAR BACKUP SECRET WEAPON

DEMOTED

[quote=mustardoverlord]It looks like our boy ex "ex" ex is having internet issues, hopefully we can fix that before the match starts but if not we're bringing in our ALL-STAR BACKUP SECRET WEAPON[/quote]

DEMOTED
716
#716
2 Frags +

.

.
717
#717
2 Frags +

WHEN DID KEV GET ON THIS ROSTER????
WHAT THE FUCK

WHEN DID KEV GET ON THIS ROSTER????
WHAT THE FUCK
718
#718
1 Frags +

He played medic for them on metalworks

He played medic for them on metalworks
719
#719
1 Frags +
BluesHe played medic for them on metalworks

BOYS GRAB EM

[quote=Blues]He played medic for them on metalworks[/quote]

BOYS GRAB EM
720
#720
3 Frags +
CorsaIM PREDICTION: CAN SLEMNISH AND KEV CARRY MUSTARD HARD ENOUGH TO GET OUT OF IM AFTER PLAYING FOR 10 SEASONS?

no actually maybe wtf

[quote=Corsa]IM PREDICTION: CAN SLEMNISH [b]AND KEV[/b] CARRY MUSTARD HARD ENOUGH TO GET OUT OF IM AFTER PLAYING FOR 10 SEASONS?[/quote]

[s]no[/s] actually maybe wtf
1 ⋅⋅ 21 22 23 24 25
This thread has been locked.