Upvote Upvoted 45 Downvote Downvoted
1 ⋅⋅ 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ⋅⋅ 39
Donald Trump
posted in World Events
991
#991
0 Frags +

we need to remedy this situation
He's shit posting nuke Now

we need to remedy this situation
He's shit posting nuke Now
992
#992
-4 Frags +

the biggest thing that has been baffling me about this email shit is that none of these sketchy emails are written by Hillary herself, just her campaign managers. people try to make the smallest shit a big deal its honestly hilarious. trumps campaign managers do some sketchy shit every day and no one bats an eye!

the biggest thing that has been baffling me about this email shit is that none of these sketchy emails are written by Hillary herself, just her campaign managers. people try to make the smallest shit a big deal its honestly hilarious. trumps campaign managers do some sketchy shit every day and no one bats an eye!
993
#993
-2 Frags +
-protothe biggest thing that has been baffling me about this email shit is that none of these sketchy emails are written by Hillary herself, just her campaign managers. people try to make the smallest shit a big deal its honestly hilarious. trumps campaign managers do some sketchy shit every day and no one bats an eye!

Examples?

Does anything compare with inciting violence at Trump rally's by hiring birddogs? Closing down the highway by having protesters chain their cars together? How about shutting down Trump's rally in Chicago and having protesters bash a glass bottle on a cops head making him bleed badly, then proceeding to block an ambulance.

How about the new revelation of John Podesta engaging in Spirit cooking (some kind of satanic ritual?)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PFDcsV02LM

Hillary's 33K+ emails have not been released publicly. Not yet anyways, but I'm sure there is some damning evidence in them. And hopefully she will be placed before a grand jury to decide her fate. The DOJ can not be trusted. Lynch needs to be resigned or impeached.

[quote=-proto]the biggest thing that has been baffling me about this email shit is that none of these sketchy emails are written by Hillary herself, just her campaign managers. people try to make the smallest shit a big deal its honestly hilarious. trumps campaign managers do some sketchy shit every day and no one bats an eye![/quote]

Examples?

Does anything compare with inciting violence at Trump rally's by hiring birddogs? Closing down the highway by having protesters chain their cars together? How about shutting down Trump's rally in Chicago and having protesters bash a glass bottle on a cops head making him bleed badly, then proceeding to block an ambulance.

How about the new revelation of John Podesta engaging in [url=http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/wikileaks-podesta-practices-occult-magic/]Spirit cooking[/url] (some kind of satanic ritual?)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PFDcsV02LM

Hillary's 33K+ emails have not been released publicly. Not yet anyways, but I'm sure there is some damning evidence in them. And hopefully she will be placed before a grand jury to decide her fate. The DOJ can not be trusted. Lynch needs to be resigned or impeached.
994
#994
-2 Frags +

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqYJRc0TJkQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqYJRc0TJkQ
995
#995
-3 Frags +
dollarlayerHow about the new revelation of John Podesta engaging in Spirit cooking (some kind of satanic ritual?)

That link is fucking gold: "Politics Explained" Bwahahahaha!

[quote=dollarlayer]How about the new revelation of John Podesta engaging in [url=http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/wikileaks-podesta-practices-occult-magic/]Spirit cooking[/url] (some kind of satanic ritual?)[/quote]
That link is fucking gold: "Politics Explained" Bwahahahaha!
996
#996
1 Frags +

.

.
997
#997
-1 Frags +
catfacehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12zVlaZyX3Q

Yep, I've known about Bill Clinton went to orgy Island and ditching his secret service detail about 30 times. But I didn't know Hillary was also engaged personally in Pedophilia and also went there.

I heard a rumor that Israeli inelegance has a video showing Bill Clinton having relations with a 13 year old girl on the island that was supposed to be released before election day.

Now they just need to release some undeniable proof so the Clintons can get tried, convicted and locked up!

[quote=catface]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12zVlaZyX3Q[/quote]

Yep, I've known about Bill Clinton went to orgy Island and ditching his secret service detail about 30 times. But I didn't know Hillary was also engaged personally in Pedophilia and also went there.

I heard a rumor that Israeli inelegance has a video showing Bill Clinton having relations with a 13 year old girl on the island that was supposed to be released before election day.

Now they just need to release some undeniable proof so the Clintons can get tried, convicted and locked up!
998
#998
-1 Frags +

dollarlayer ur the only person keeping this thread alive pls stop

dollarlayer ur the only person keeping this thread alive pls stop
999
#999
0 Frags +
Blithedollarlayer ur the only person keeping this thread alive pls stop

That's interesting because there have been about 40 posts in this thread in the past 24 hours and only 2 of them are mine. If you don't like this thread, then ignore it.

[quote=Blithe]dollarlayer ur the only person keeping this thread alive pls stop[/quote]

That's interesting because there have been about 40 posts in this thread in the past 24 hours and only 2 of them are mine. If you don't like this thread, then ignore it.
1000
#1000
0 Frags +

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kbryz0mxuMY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kbryz0mxuMY
1001
#1001
refresh.tf
5 Frags +
Nub_DanishCollaide He doesn't care about outsourced jobs, if he did, he wouldn't produce his own ties in china.
You don't get to be a billionaire by making bad business decisions, spending 10 times more to produce something is a bad business decision. People seem to dislike trump because hes against free trade because the usa is losing out in a free market against places that can produce things much cheaper, he talks constantly about imposing tarifs to help the us work force.

How fucking thick are you? I already tackled all of these points.

[quote=Nub_Danish][quote=Collaide] He doesn't care about outsourced jobs, if he did, he wouldn't produce his own ties in china.[/quote]

You don't get to be a billionaire by making bad business decisions, spending 10 times more to produce something is a bad business decision. People seem to dislike trump because hes against free trade because the usa is losing out in a free market against places that can produce things much cheaper, he talks constantly about imposing tarifs to help the us work force.[/quote]

How fucking thick are you? I already tackled all of these points.
1002
#1002
-6 Frags +

Trump's poll progress has stalled and Clinton's lead is solidifying at around 4 points. He'll need another breakthrough moment to win, but something people will believe and care about rather than satanic dinners, paedo island and Hillary jihadi. Sorry for the slightly mad inhabitants of the thread for this disappointing news.

Trump's poll progress has stalled and Clinton's lead is solidifying at around 4 points. He'll need another breakthrough moment to win, but something people will believe and care about rather than satanic dinners, paedo island and Hillary jihadi. Sorry for the slightly mad inhabitants of the thread for this disappointing news.
1003
#1003
4 Frags +

.

.
1004
#1004
-5 Frags +

But they don't believe it do they? Reading comprehension, it's not hard

But they don't believe it do they? Reading comprehension, it's not hard
1005
#1005
6 Frags +

.

.
1006
#1006
-5 Frags +

Serious public opinion analysis organisations with a track record of neutral and dispassionate success maake me think so. If people believed the lurid claims in any significant numbers she's be far more toxic than Trump and stand no chance whatsoever. You are either a blind moron to rely on such an absurdly meaningless sample as "people you talk to" to draw your macroscopic conclusions or you're one of the self appointed army of Trump trolls mindlessly spreading this flimsy crap that you think passes for politics. The fact is if Clinton hadn't stupidly shot herself in the foot with the email server Trump would be nowhere. This cospiracy crap is a total electoral irrelevance, you're a meaningless minority talking to eachother in an echo chamber.

Trump currently has an outside chance of around 33%. It's down to getting voters to turn out at this stage.

Serious public opinion analysis organisations with a track record of neutral and dispassionate success maake me think so. If people believed the lurid claims in any significant numbers she's be far more toxic than Trump and stand no chance whatsoever. You are either a blind moron to rely on such an absurdly meaningless sample as "people you talk to" to draw your macroscopic conclusions or you're one of the self appointed army of Trump trolls mindlessly spreading this flimsy crap that you think passes for politics. The fact is if Clinton hadn't stupidly shot herself in the foot with the email server Trump would be nowhere. This cospiracy crap is a total electoral irrelevance, you're a meaningless minority talking to eachother in an echo chamber.

Trump currently has an outside chance of around 33%. It's down to getting voters to turn out at this stage.
1007
#1007
6 Frags +

.

.
1008
#1008
-5 Frags +

Not interested in hearing about how they're satanically controlled sex offender infested hell holes thanks. I'll leave you to the fantasy world, but if you like you can see the example of how the paranoia shut down rational debate. Democratic eh?

Not interested in hearing about how they're satanically controlled sex offender infested hell holes thanks. I'll leave you to the fantasy world, but if you like you can see the example of how the paranoia shut down rational debate. Democratic eh?
1009
#1009
6 Frags +

.

.
1010
#1010
0 Frags +
GentlemanJonNot interested in hearing about how they're satanically controlled sex offender infested hell holes thanks. I'll leave you to the fantasy world, but if you like you can see the example of how the paranoia shut down rational debate. Democratic eh?

Just curious, what do you think of this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKjuTv85Maw

And the numerous other videos of this creepy fuck kissing and hugging small girls? Just conspiracy theories right? It's you who's living in a fantasy world if you think the pedophilia accusations are all baseless.

[quote=GentlemanJon]Not interested in hearing about how they're satanically controlled sex offender infested hell holes thanks. I'll leave you to the fantasy world, but if you like you can see the example of how the paranoia shut down rational debate. Democratic eh?[/quote]
Just curious, what do you think of this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKjuTv85Maw

And the numerous other videos of this creepy fuck kissing and hugging small girls? Just conspiracy theories right? It's you who's living in a fantasy world if you think the pedophilia accusations are all baseless.
1011
#1011
-3 Frags +
catfacei just asked you to share your sources my man, your whole argument is based solely upon them so proving they actually exist isn't much to ask. you can't say you own a purple unicorn, and then refuse to show it to people because they might call you out for it actually being a regular horse painted purple. also how am i the one in the fantasy land when you're throwing out numbers and statistics out of your ass and then calling me paranoid when i want to know where you're getting them from.

538 popularised it but they're far from the only poll analysing outfit these days. If you're interested they're not hard to find for yourself, but they tend to be kind of boring and not for kids. If you're interested in Bill Clinton sex demon or Hillary Clinton jihad secret agent then I doubt they're really something you'd read much of. Feel free to make up something about them being run by members of Bill Clinton's paedophile ring or similar.

Funnily enough when Trump was steaming earlier in the week and I pointed out the poll evidence there weren't any doubters. Shocking I know.

SweetPeaIt's you who's living in a fantasy world if you think the pedophilia accusations are all baseless.

Are you trying to demonstrate your inability to engage your basic critical faculties in the most rudimentary way or am I missing something?

[quote=catface]i just asked you to share your sources my man, your whole argument is based solely upon them so proving they actually exist isn't much to ask. you can't say you own a purple unicorn, and then refuse to show it to people because they might call you out for it actually being a regular horse painted purple. also how am i the one in the fantasy land when you're throwing out numbers and statistics out of your ass and then calling me paranoid when i want to know where you're getting them from.[/quote]
538 popularised it but they're far from the only poll analysing outfit these days. If you're interested they're not hard to find for yourself, but they tend to be kind of boring and not for kids. If you're interested in Bill Clinton sex demon or Hillary Clinton jihad secret agent then I doubt they're really something you'd read much of. Feel free to make up something about them being run by members of Bill Clinton's paedophile ring or similar.

Funnily enough when Trump was steaming earlier in the week and I pointed out the poll evidence there weren't any doubters. Shocking I know.

[quote=SweetPea]It's you who's living in a fantasy world if you think the pedophilia accusations are all baseless.[/quote]
Are you trying to demonstrate your inability to engage your basic critical faculties in the most rudimentary way or am I missing something?
1012
#1012
5 Frags +

.

.
1013
#1013
-2 Frags +
catfaceas far as i can tell nate silver has a pretty good track record and is not biased to either party, but you can't just base all of your data on 538 (an opinion poll analysis site, that actively tries to draw attention to the fact that polls are really not as accurate as they claim to be)

i would have made the same posts as now back then if i had opened this thread once before i posted the clinton pedo connection video

You see this is the problem, Nate Silver as a person is irrelevant, the methodology is what matters and as it's public you can freely asses it. As I said, not really for kids.

I didn't say it was my only source, once again not reading what I've written. I'm encouraging you to find your own information, I have no interest in changing your opinion. Wasn't a problem when Trump was gaining with all guns blazing. There seems to be a reasonable consensus that Trump has around a one in three chance right now. Those are pretty good odds considering how the campaign has gone. Roll some dice a few times and see how hard it is to hit 1 in 3. Not that hard right?

I know you would have made the same posts, that's what being in a Trump supporting echo chamber is. I have literally no bias in this election, both candidates share my contempt equally.

[quote=catface]as far as i can tell nate silver has a pretty good track record and is not biased to either party, but you can't just base all of your data on 538 (an opinion poll analysis site, that actively tries to draw attention to the fact that polls are really not as accurate as they claim to be)

i would have made the same posts as now back then if i had opened this thread once before i posted the clinton pedo connection video[/quote]
You see this is the problem, Nate Silver as a person is irrelevant, the methodology is what matters and as it's public you can freely asses it. As I said, not really for kids.

I didn't say it was my only source, once again not reading what I've written. I'm encouraging you to find your own information, I have no interest in changing your opinion. Wasn't a problem when Trump was gaining with all guns blazing. There seems to be a reasonable consensus that Trump has around a one in three chance right now. Those are pretty good odds considering how the campaign has gone. Roll some dice a few times and see how hard it is to hit 1 in 3. Not that hard right?

I know you would have made the same posts, that's what being in a Trump supporting echo chamber is. I have literally no bias in this election, both candidates share my contempt equally.
1014
#1014
0 Frags +

Since we're discussing 538, does anyone know whether they factor in early voting? Obviously you can't expect an early vote to automatically fall in line with the state of the polls when it was cast, but maybe there are tools to price in that sort of stuff.

Since we're discussing 538, does anyone know whether they factor in early voting? Obviously you can't expect an early vote to automatically fall in line with the state of the polls when it was cast, but maybe there are tools to price in that sort of stuff.
1015
#1015
-3 Frags +
SearchlightSince we're discussing 538, does anyone know whether they factor in early voting? Obviously you can't expect an early vote to automatically fall in line with the state of the polls when it was cast, but maybe there are tools to price in that sort of stuff.

I've looked for this but as it seems to be a pretty new thing I don't think anyone is confident enough to model it seeing as there isn't much historically to go on. There have definitely been a sizeable chunk of early votes cast in a more Trump hostile atmosphere, but at the same time the Clinton backlash was pretty big in the last few days too and who that might motivate to turn out early and why is open to question.

If Clinton takes a lot of states that have ended up polling on a knife edge then it could certainly be a reason why, I'll be interested in how it gets unpicked after the election.

[quote=Searchlight]Since we're discussing 538, does anyone know whether they factor in early voting? Obviously you can't expect an early vote to automatically fall in line with the state of the polls when it was cast, but maybe there are tools to price in that sort of stuff.[/quote]
I've looked for this but as it seems to be a pretty new thing I don't think anyone is confident enough to model it seeing as there isn't much historically to go on. There have definitely been a sizeable chunk of early votes cast in a more Trump hostile atmosphere, but at the same time the Clinton backlash was pretty big in the last few days too and who that might motivate to turn out early and why is open to question.

If Clinton takes a lot of states that have ended up polling on a knife edge then it could certainly be a reason why, I'll be interested in how it gets unpicked after the election.
1016
#1016
9 Frags +

.

.
1017
#1017
-4 Frags +
catfacewhen have i said that i'm a trump supporter? my first post was a video discussing the clinton's connections to an illegal sex trafficking ring. i mean i guess the closest you can get is me posting that video of bill still talking about trump leading clinton in new hampshire and how he has a good chance of winning, but it was just because you were basically declaring hillary had won

She is very strongly favoured, that's just the facts. If Trump wants to become very strongly favoured instead he needs something new that will play well across the country, or he needs Clinton to fuck up somehow in a new way. His comeback is stalling short of the finishing line.

People aren't going to buy these smears in any kind of significant numbers, they're too incredible and don't have any official weight to them, sorry if you think they're electorally decisive content but they're not. If the FBI announces they're opening a sex offences investigation then that's another matter, but they haven't and nobody expects them to either.

Most people won't draw the conclusion that this is because of a secretive liberal elite in a child abuse cult, but that they're meaningless smears with nothing to them. That's why they're not going to make meaningful headway outside of people who already believe this, but those aren't the people Trump needs to convince to improve his chances.

Get it now?

e: I should make it clear that although their positions seem to be solidifying close to the date there is a clear margin for error that means that Trump could right now be in the box seat. It's just not likely. For both sides their best bet is to get their supporters out to vote which is what both sides are doing - if they had a big blow left to land they'd have done it. They're concentrating on motivating their existing supporters. In this sense the "Trump content for Trump supporters" activity makes perfect sense - it's basically saying don't forget to vote, just like the "Trump is an unacceptable human being" stuff for Clinton supporters is designed to do.

[quote=catface]when have i said that i'm a trump supporter? my first post was a video discussing the clinton's connections to an illegal sex trafficking ring. i mean i guess the closest you can get is me posting that video of bill still talking about trump leading clinton in new hampshire and how he has a good chance of winning, but it was just because you were basically declaring hillary had won[/quote]
She is very strongly favoured, that's just the facts. If Trump wants to become very strongly favoured instead he needs something new that will play well across the country, or he needs Clinton to fuck up somehow in a new way. His comeback is stalling short of the finishing line.

People aren't going to buy these smears in any kind of significant numbers, they're too incredible and don't have any official weight to them, sorry if you think they're electorally decisive content but they're not. If the FBI announces they're opening a sex offences investigation then that's another matter, but they haven't and nobody expects them to either.

Most people won't draw the conclusion that this is because of a secretive liberal elite in a child abuse cult, but that they're meaningless smears with nothing to them. That's why they're not going to make meaningful headway outside of people who already believe this, but those aren't the people Trump needs to convince to improve his chances.

Get it now?

e: I should make it clear that although their positions seem to be solidifying close to the date there is a clear margin for error that means that Trump could right now be in the box seat. It's just not likely. For both sides their best bet is to get their supporters out to vote which is what both sides are doing - if they had a big blow left to land they'd have done it. They're concentrating on motivating their existing supporters. In this sense the "Trump content for Trump supporters" activity makes perfect sense - it's basically saying don't forget to vote, just like the "Trump is an unacceptable human being" stuff for Clinton supporters is designed to do.
1018
#1018
-6 Frags +

go into weeabootique communit NA tf2 server which is basically all trump supporters
said "what you gonna do when Hillary wins"
"rise up"
"revolt"
I said: You will do nothing. :)
banned ;_;

I can't believe how dumb people can be, wading past all the corruption and collusion "Sanders only allowed to run if he wouldn't attack clinton" and go to some modern artist, and go like DEY BE CHILD EATING SATANISTS YALL. it makes them look so fucking retarded. For those that geniunely believe nuclear war will erupt if that cunt clinton is elected i'm willing to make a bet, if she gets in, and theres no nuclear war you owe me all your moniez and get to be my maid, If i'm wrong i'll prolly be eating 50 nukes due to my proximity to Brussels. Hmu if u want to take that bet..

go into weeabootique communit NA tf2 server which is basically all trump supporters
said "what you gonna do when Hillary wins"
"rise up"
"revolt"
I said: You will do nothing. :)
banned ;_;

I can't believe how dumb people can be, wading past all the corruption and collusion "Sanders only allowed to run if he wouldn't attack clinton" and go to some modern artist, and go like DEY BE CHILD EATING SATANISTS YALL. it makes them look so fucking retarded. For those that geniunely believe nuclear war will erupt if that cunt clinton is elected i'm willing to make a bet, if she gets in, and theres no nuclear war you owe me all your moniez and get to be my maid, If i'm wrong i'll prolly be eating 50 nukes due to my proximity to Brussels. Hmu if u want to take that bet..
1019
#1019
7 Frags +
PankeymanAlex Jones was right all along lmao

Yeah but how are the fish people doing?

[quote=Pankeyman][url=https://youtu.be/gSlN87bhYzU]Alex Jones was right all along lmao[/url][/quote]
Yeah but how are the fish people doing?
1020
#1020
10 Frags +

And I thought people in this thread were dumb before...

And I thought people in this thread were dumb before...
1 ⋅⋅ 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ⋅⋅ 39
This thread has been locked.